Potential Progress on Negotiations over the Northern Ireland Protocol by Tyisse Baxter

At this year’s British-Irish Council summit, the United Kingdom and Ireland recently discussed reforms to the Northern Ireland Protocol. The protocol allows goods to be moved across the Irish-UK border without customs checks. It is intended to preserve the Good Friday Agreement by preventing a border from forming between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

One of the major problems with the Northern Ireland Protocol are the customs checks. The customs checks are conducted in Northern Irish ports instead of at the Irish-UK border. These customs checks have slowed transportation of goods into Northern Ireland, causing shortages of goods, including medications and chilled meats. The protocol has also angered Unionists in Northern Ireland, who believe that the protocol places a border between it and the rest of the UK. 1 After the 2022 elections, the Democratic Unionists Party refused to enter a power-sharing agreement with Sinn Fein until these issues are resolved.

A successful revision of the Northern Ireland Protocol is not guaranteed. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Conservative Party MPs support the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill, which would allow goods to enter Northern Ireland without customs checks. it is not guaranteed that the Democratic Unionist Party would agree to enter a power-sharing deal with Sinn Fein. 2

Still, the UK and Ireland are hopeful however that progress can be made. Minister Rishi Sunak is open to finding a solution. He would like to achieve an agreement that lessens paperwork and checks on goods coming into Northern Ireland. 3 Sunak also attended the summit, the first Prime Minister to do so in 15 years. 4 Likewise, Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney Simon believes that reforms can be completed by Christmas to have a power-sharing agreement between the DUP and Sinn Fein. 5 Furthermore, outside of the British-Irish Council summit, the European Union began testing the UK’s database on goods cominginto Northern Ireland. 6

1 Tom Edgington, “What is the Northern Ireland Protocol?,” BBC News, October 27, 2022, accessed November 16, 2022, https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-53724381

2 Shawn Pogatchnik, “Ireland: UK-EU deal on fixing Brexit trade protocol ‘doable’ by Christmas,” Politico, November 8, 2022, accessed November 11https://www.politico.eu/article/ireland-uk-eu-deal-brexit-trade-protocol-christmas-simon-coveney/

3 Shawn Pogatchnik, “Sunak seek negotiated solution to Brexit trade row in first talks with Ireland,” Politico, November 10 2022, accessed November 11 https://www.politico.eu/article/rishi-sunak-brexit-trade-tensions-ireland-talks-protocol/

4 Sandford, “Summit”

5 Pogatchnik, “Doable,”

6 Ibid.,

Rishi Sunak and the Possibility of Improved UK-EU Relations by Tyisse Baxter

Former Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak succeeded Liz Truss as Prime Minster after her resignation last month. On foreign policy issues, his positions are similar to those of his predecessors. Sunak is expected to continue Global Britain's foreign policy objectives. 1 EU-UK relations have soured since the UK left the EU in 2020. However, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine, and trade disputes over the Northern Ireland Protocol present opportunities to strengthen EU-UK relations.

One of the most contentious issues between the United Kingdom and the European Union is the Northern Ireland Protocol. Custom checks on goods coming into Northern Ireland have led to medicine and food shortages. Also, it has led to a political crisis as the Democratic Unionist Party refused to agree to a power-sharing deal until the protocol is revised. The UK and EU have so far been unable to agree on possible solutions and have instead clashed over the UK’s refusal to enforce of the Protocol.

The United Kingdom and the European Union could end this deadlock under Rishi Sunak. In contrast to his predecessors, Sunak has stated that while he is supporting a bill that would override the protocol, he is open to a negotiation 23 Likewise, the EU has also made it clear that it is willing to compromise with the United Kingdom to settle issues stemming from the Northern Ireland Protocol. Rishi Sunak attended the most recent British-Irish Council summit in to address these challenges and express his hope that progress would continue. He was the first Prime Minister to attend the summit in 15 years. 4

Additionally, the UK and the EU could continue collaborating on foreign and security policy matters. Both are still committed to supplying Ukraine with military equipment and aid, deterring further Russian aggression, and maintaining security in Europe. To tackle the energy prices, both the EU and UK could build on existing efforts. Before she resigned, the UK was about to sign a memorandum of understanding with the Northern Seas Energy Cooperation. 5 The European Political Community is the best opportunity to discuss these issues.

The EU is optimistic about working with Sunak. EU officials believe that stability within the United Kingdom is necessary for solving the multiple crises affecting Europe. 6 Domestic politics could be an obstacle. Sunak was an early supporter of Brexit and is intent on delivering Brexit promises. He may also face resistance from Eurosceptic MPs of his own party if he compromises with the EU on any issue. Still, there is a chance to improve UK-EU relations.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

1 Ben Baxendale-Smith, “Foreign policy challenges facing the Sunak Government,” Wilson Center, November 2, 2022, accessed November 3, 2022, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/foreign-policy-challenges-facing-sunak-government

2 Brendon Hughes, “Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak set out stalls on Northern ahead of Tory leadership hustings,” BelfastLive, October 26, 2022, accessed September 16, 2022, https://www.belfastlive.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/liz-truss-rishi-sunak-set-24767624

3 Gabriela Baczynka, “UK and EU must work together, bloc’s chairman tells new PM Sunak,” Reuters, October 24, 2022, November 16, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britain-eu-must-work-together-blocs-chairman-tells-pm-sunak-2022-10-24/

4 Shawn Pogatchnik, “Sunak seek negotiated solution to Brexit trade row in first talks with Ireland,” Politico, November 10 2022, accessed November 11 https://www.politico.eu/article/rishi-sunak-brexit-trade-tensions-ireland-talks-protocol/

5 Andy Bounds, “UK to sign deal with EU energy partnership amid thawing relations,” Financial Times, October 6, 2022, accessed November 16. 2022, https://www.ft.com/content/e7faef6b-f2a3-4622-a51b-896b7d25e45d

6 Jon Henley and Samantha Lock, “’Groundbreaking milestone’: world reacts to Rishi Sunak as new British PM,” The Guardian, October 25, 2022, accessed September 2022, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/oct/25/groundbreaking-milestone-world-reacts-to-rishi-sunak-as-next-british-prime-minister

Afghanistan: What Happens After the U.S. Withdraws?

On July 15, young professionals gathered to discuss a topic that has aroused positive and negative reactions from experts, policymakers, and U.S. citizens alike: the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. Despite the nearly 60 percent of Americans agreeing with the decision (Quinnipiac), concerns about human rights and the resurgence of Islamic terror voiced by President George W. Bush and General David Petraeus, top decision-makers at the height of the war, has led others to wonder: “Are we doing the right thing?”

Our discussion participants, from a variety of backgrounds and disciplines, agreed that the answer to this question depends on perspective.  Some Afghans believe the U.S withdrawal is one step in the mission of retrieving their country from foreign intervention and creating a government that embodies Afghanistan’s values.  However, this fact overlooks the many Afghans that assisted the U.S. government as translators and lookouts that face increased threats of revenge killings by the Taliban insurgency, which has claimed over 150 districts surrounding Kabul. A recently released UN report discovered that a record 5,000 civilian casualties occurred in the first half of 2021, attributed entirely to fighting between the Taliban and other anti-government forces (69%) and pro-government forces (UN). The Taliban has severely curtailed and punished freedom of expression in its controlled territories. Most importantly, women have fled their homes in fear of the Taliban forcing them to marry their fighters or become sex slaves (Foreign Policy). Moreover, reports from Taliban captured districts prove the Taliban’s allegiance to reinstalling its hardline pre-2001 regime that severely curtailed female independence in Afghan society. Experts predict the increased violence and abrogation of basic freedoms will only worsen as the U.S. pulls out and the Taliban tightens its stranglehold on Kabul. The U.S withdrawal appears to leave certain Afghans more vulnerable to attacks on their physical and political autonomy.

Conversely, over two thousand U.S. soldiers have died in Afghanistan trying to prop up the government since the U.S. unseated the Taliban from power in 2001.  Despite substantial gains in women’s participation in Afghan society, two presidential elections, and the assassination of Osama Bin Laden, fissures across ethnic and ideological lines have increasingly encumbered efforts to create a fully functional democracy.  Continuing in this nation-building exercise to be a fools’ errand and ruinous waste of substantial resources indispensable in the U.S. effort to counter China’s rise.

In these stark terms, the decision to withdraw from Afghanistan is a clear example of the U.S. doing right by itself.  Yet, the consequences of U.S. involvement and withdrawal from Afghanistan warrant that the U.S. figure out how to do right by Afghanistan. Afghanistan faces not only internal challenges related to the Taliban but also external state and non-state forces wishing to capitalize on its weakness and undermine Afghanistan’s sovereignty and stability to expand their sphere of influence. The deteriorating security situation and widespread government distrust and corruption will continue long beyond the U.S. withdrawal. Therefore, the U.S needs to assist Afghanistan in addressing and defending against these challenges as their relationship evolves to accommodate a self-sufficient Afghanistan and its own changing priorities. 

By Nina Burges, YPIA Intern

Human Rights in Latin America: A Review

On June 17, YPIA discussed  Human Rights in Latin America with three experts whose work focuses on combating diverse errors in the international system by empowering disadvantaged women.   Kristen Martinez-Gugerli of the Washington Office of Latin America, Ana Barreto of AfroResistence, and independent journalist and producer Natalia Bonilla have devoted their careers to the underscoring of disparate populations in Columbia,  Venezuela, and Brazil. During the discussion, participants touched on a myriad of important issues such as migration, gender-based violence, police brutality, ongoing protests, media polarization, and imprisonment of activists.  

Rapid developments of COVID in Columbia in 2020 lead to the government imposing migration restrictions between itself and Venezuela. In November upwards of 5.4 million refugees fled Venezuela in search of better social dynamics and economic opportunities. Furthering the strained social relations in Columbia, where mass protests against tax reforms and historically damaging police brutality recently took place. Similarly, resistance in Brazil has brought attention to the unequal treatment of minority groups and women in the favelas who have been targeted for gang violence. Surprise mass police visits have further negatively impacted the favelas rather than reducing gang violence. 

Even in the midst of the pandemic, toxic masculinity from the institutional level is amplified by the actions of police in Brazil. Police reactions to increased protests have led to civilian casualties. Political figures' positions on social issues and responses to economic peril can be attributed to the psychologically ingrained behavior from the historical dynamics between men, women, and minority groups. Dispelling reports of COVID death, cases, and hospitalizations by head figures is another factor impinging on people’s grasp on reality. 

Although these issues are multifaceted and complex, discussing these topics helps reveal disparities and injustices that continue to impact domestic and foreign policy. The discussion concluded with the speaker and participants agreeing on the importance of understanding each other and recognizing how North American-like standards impact our actions in other countries.

by Alexi Santiago, YPIA Intern

———————————————————————————————————

1. United Nations High Commissioner of Refugees. “Venezuela Situation”. https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/venezuela-emergency.html


Know Before You Celebrate: Understanding Cinco de Mayo

Despite common misconceptions, Cinco de Mayo, or the fifth of May, is not Mexican Independence Day. Mexico gained independence from Spain on September 16, 1810. Cinco de Mayo celebrates the date of the Mexican army’s May 5, 1862 victory over France at the Battle of Puebla during the Franco-Mexican War. Though a minor holiday in Mexico, Chicano activists raised awareness of the holiday in the United States in the 1960s, in part because they identified with the victory of indigenous and mestizos (people of mixed indigenous and Spain descent) over European invaders. Today, the victory is celebrated with parties, mariachi music, Mexican folk dancing and traditional foods. Some of the largest festivals are held in Los AngelesChicago and Houston.

 What exactly makes this battle so important? 

 In 1861, Mexican President Benito Juarez (himself a member of the Zapotec indigenous tribe) was forced to default on debt payments to foreign governments. While Mexico was able to negotiate an agreement with Spain and England, France’s Napoleon III saw this as an opportunity to carve an empire out of Mexico. By late 1861, 6,000 French troops were sent to siege Puebla and were met with an army of a mere 2,000 poorly armed troops led by General Ignacio Zaragoza. After a full day’s battle, France retreated with over 500 dead compared to less than 100 casualties on the Mexican side. Zaragoza’s success represented a great symbolic victory for the Mexican government and bolstered the resistance movement. In 1867—thanks in part to military support and political pressure from the United States, France finally withdrew from Mexico.

Now celebrate Cinco de Mayo with the knowledge of knowing why you are celebrating.

Source: history.com

Why the Arab States Are Falling Behind in Implementing the SDGs?

 

Why the Arab States Are Falling Behind in Implementing the SDGs?

 Post-COVID 19, a new economic order will emerge and the world will witness the rise of new economies and the collapse of others. The Arab region is not immune to these changes, in addition to the effect of COVID-19, the area is home to some of the worst humanitarian crises worldwide, conflict, high youth unemployment, poor economic performance, gender inequality, migration, brain drain, water scarcity, climate change, and above all weak governance. With so many problems, it is difficult to know where to begin to address them and what roles domestic actors should play to bring the change that the region desperately needs. Although the array of challenges and barriers facing Arab countries are manifesting across the region to varying degrees, it is difficult to see an end in sight and the prospects for reform seem remote.

In 2015, world leaders adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). At that time, they were considered by many, including Arab leaders as a blueprint for prosperity. However, the initial commitment to the SDGs has lost its resonance as countries failed to implement policies to address the urgent needs of the region’s inhabitants. While there is no consensus on the root causes of the region's economic and social woes, three issues loom particularly large - good governance, corruption, and the rentier system. Given the ramifications of these three challenges, experts perceive their resolution key for Arab countries to move forward in achieving the 2030 Agenda.

1. Rentier System

For decades a contract has been established between Arab governments and their citizens to trade social services, public jobs and benefits that stem from oil revenues for political acquiescence. This state of affairs has created a specific rentier mentality and evolved into a culture of state-reliance that severely thwart the development of institutions. As a result, only a few are engaged in the generation of rent (wealth), while a majority are involved in the distribution or utilization of it.

How sustainable are the rentier economies in the Arab region? A closer look shows an exponentially decaying trend in most countries where rents are used to subsidize goods and services and generate jobs in the public sector, especially when oil prices are high. However, once oil prices drop, it leads to a government budget deficit, requiring either an increase in taxes or government spending cuts. This unstable tendency has rendered the system unsustainable, put Arab societies under severe strain, and made it difficult to address genuine grievances.

Furthermore, oil reserves, which serve as the only source of revenue in some countries, have declined dramatically in many Arab countries making the already-challenging political and economic status quo more likely to fall. Even oil-importing economies like Egypt, Jordan, and Sudan, are tied to the economies of the oil exporters in the region in terms of remittances, external assistance, and labor markets for their citizens. In addition, economic development hasn’t kept pace with population growth as state institutions struggle with the rising demands of citizens. Over the past decades, Arab populations have grown from 222.7 million in 1990 to 436.4 million inhabitants in 2020. As a result, population growth has depressed living standards in most states exerting a significant negative effect on per capita income growth. Thereby, vulnerable populations continue to be at risk of being left behind which constitutes a potential threat to political and economic stability in the long run.

Amid strong and increasingly intractable dilemmas, Arab governments need to usher in a transformative shift in development by replacing the rentier state paradigm with a new structure that is based on merit, work-reward, innovation, and initiative. By the same token, any effort at economic diversification must confront the imbalances inside the rentier system by strengthening the role of the private sector, ending the domination of the public sector over the private sector, and replacing subsidies with targeted programs. To do so, will require challenging the political institutions as well as social and cultural practices within the society that have evolved over decades around them.

2. Good Governance

In order for Arab states to improve their capacity to govern, they need to develop new capabilities to grow sustainably and inclusively. Reform initiatives must gradually shift from centralized decision making to implementing specific policies and programs that align with the SDG goals and targets. More importantly, functional states require functional institutions. However, functional institutions require a modus operandi that is based on five modes of government: governance through hierarchy, persuasion, markets and contracts, community engagement, and network associations. These modes deserve considerable attention because they are fundamentals to strengthen state institutions and make them more efficient.

Meanwhile, the policy orientation, organization, and management stage of reforms should be marked by three major tasks. A wider institutional upgrading, developing closer ties with non-government sectors, and improving levels of political participation that harness “the power of citizens” to steer economic progress in the right direction. In this regard, the first test is to re-gain the political will to initiate change and to move in a new policy direction. Due to the fact that the responsibility for reshaping the region rests primarily with governments and their people, Arab leaders and citizens are invited to develop a new social contract based on more sustainable political and socio-economic models. Otherwise, all forms of good governance will be eroded, and attempts to achieve the SDGs are likely to fail.

Furthermore, for change to be transformative, regaining the eroded trust between governments and their citizens is key. Too many Arab leaders treat their citizens with caution and consider them as threats to be managed rather than as resources to be nurtured. Thus, laying the foundations of a new social contract between governments and their citizens as a starting point is necessary for the region to succeed. However, the need to move beyond abstract concepts of the social contract requires mobilizing the potential of human and non-human resources at their maximum capacity. Meanwhile, it entails a high level of engagement while taking into account national realities, capacities, and levels of developments in each country in order to accelerate the pace of implementation of the SDGs. Finally, aligning national priorities with the SDGs and changing the institutional setup for its implementation will bolster confidence in the overall system architecture of the region and boost its socio-economic development.

3. Fighting Corruption

There's a recognition among scholars that high levels of corruption result from low levels of social trust increasing potential for internal disorder and conflict. Unfortunately for the Arab states, the ability of people and societies to come together and effect change is impeded by the corruption that is engrained in institutions whether they are political or legal. What's more, gaps in most counties legal systems sustain corrupt practices. Highly personalized institutions controlled by ruling elites further create setbacks in combating corruption. This has turned legal and institutional anti-corruption agencies into more lip service rather than real independent judiciaries that hold corrupt people accountable for their actions.

Furthermore, in the absence of any transparent legal institutions and accountability mechanisms, the role of certain patronage networks with their entrenched economic interests has become a handicap for development. Most of these patronage networks dominate different aspects of Arab economies, operate with minimal scrutiny, and benefit from weak regulations and lax enforcement . Additionally, part of what enables these networks is the administrative loopholes within laws that give leeway for total impunity. Allowing corruption to become rife with little accountability.  Weak enforcement mechanisms with a limited number of corruption prosecutions and condemnations, make the region a safe haven for corrupt people.

In order for the region to build a prosperous society, Arab governments must establish new standards of accountability, both within state institutions and between them. Without strong, independent, and efficient legal institutions, corruption will continue to flourish, further exacerbating the socioeconomic fragility of the region, and nurturing public distrust of the government.

The Way Forward

Five years into the 2030 Agenda, the Arab region is falling behind on the global stage and all indicators point to a delay in achieving the SDGs. These indicators, however, only tell part of the story, the area is the least integrated region in the world in terms of trade, despite its tremendous resources and capabilities.

There are no quick remedies to any of the above mentioned socio-economic challenges but the region can work together and implement an integrated policy approach to achieve the SDGs by 2030. In light of this, there is no single answer on how SDG priorities should be approached in a post COVID-19 environment. However, the starting point for implementation must focus on goal 16 because economic development efforts are unlikely to succeed without peaceful and inclusive societies. Moreover, there is an increasing recognition, among governments and citizens across the region, that more effort needs to be made in fighting corruption, fostering a culture of accountability, and promoting the rule of law. What’s more, Arab decision-makers should know that economic prosperity is not measured by hydrocarbons or natural resources but by the real wealth which resides in the region's youthful and dynamic population. Thus, as they voice for change and pave the way for reform, they should consider investing in human capital and embrace a policy of work-reward, innovation, and initiative.

Pockets of hope remain as long as the voice for change continues to exist. However, the plans for SDGs achievement in 2030 must go hand-in-hand with a transformative shift in development. By aligning and integrating planning and budgeting within a fully nationalized SDG monitoring framework, the SDGs will provide Arab countries a framework for a safer economy. A robust policy design must highlight obstacles, assess them, and mobilize internal and external resources to ensure sustainable economic solutions.

The Author

Abdelillah Bendaoudi is a freelance writer based in Maryland with a particular focus on counterterrorism. He is also a reporter and contributor at the Muslim Link Newspaper.

In The Post-COVID 19 World: Are We On Track To Achieve The SDGs?

Amid the pandemic and the subsequent recession, the world is facing a crisis unlike any in recent history. COVID-19 has thrown decades of hard-work towards eradicating poverty and put multilateralism and cooperation among world governments in question. While casting doubts and uncertainty over a fast economic recovery in a post-COVID 19 future. In that event, experts and scholars are wondering if investing in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is a worthy objective. Have they become irrelevant? Should we cling on to them as the only feasible plan that could guide us to a path out of the crisis? Any attempt to answer these questions will be critical to help us contextualize the future of Sustainable Development. The truth is, the SDGs remain relevant more than ever. Today, COVID-19 has only brought their importance to new light and the real challenge is how should we proceed and what goals should we prioritize until the crisis is over. Given the global nature of the pandemic, the SDGs with their 169 targets could deliver a fast recovery and serve as a blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all by the end of 2030. In order to do so, they must become a driver for a common policy framework to mitigate the pandemic’s broader consequences. 

Although great strides have been achieved, the pace has slowed in 2020, and in some cases, turned back decades of progress due to COVID-19. Even before the crisis, the world was off-track to fulfill the SDGs and many countries appear to be falling behind in delivering targets. The Social Progress Imperative nonprofit organization recently published its 2020 Social Progress Index projections, which tracks how current and future trajectories of social progress will look in 2030. Sparking debate, the report asserts the pandemic is endangering to set back global development by a decade, thereby, delaying the achievement of the SDGs by 62 years unless urgent actions are taken.

Since the onset of the pandemic, the 2030 agenda has been put on hold, and governments particularly in developing countries are prioritizing the fight against COVID-19 over other pressing matters. This has resulted in poor performance on many fronts and translated into a lack of trust that the SDGs promise won't be fulfilled. Besides, the pandemic threatens to erase decades of progress on poverty, hunger, health care, and education exacerbating the problem of inequality. As it becomes increasingly clear that stalled progress on SDGs could have a lasting negative effect, it is critical to combine global efforts and develop sustainable solutions.

A decade away from delivering the 2030 promise, extensive debates around the 2030 Agenda implementation are increasingly focused on how the world could effectively uphold a ‘leave no one behind’ agenda in the post-COVID-19 period. Moreover, there is a realization from policymakers that traditional aid from developed countries in the COVID-19 world, will fall short. Therefore, new innovative methods are necessary in order to keep pace with the delays caused by the disease in achieving the SDG goals and targets.

Current Trends

A closer look at the unfolding economic and social impacts of COVID-19, including projections of the year 2020 suggest the pandemic abruptly disrupted the implementation of many goals and progress either faded or been reversed in various areas turning the next decade of action towards achieving the SDGs into something of a pipe dream. A data assessment of current world trends points out that in the first three months, the total of unemployed people in the G7 countries has varied widely, from 30 million in the United States to 1.76 million in Japan. Unfortunately, many of these jobs will likely not come back even if the pace of the rapid jobs recovery is sustained when the pandemic is over.

Furthermore, claims for unemployment benefits have soared in most developed countries by hundreds of millions of people. Whereas, the situation in developing countries is bleaker where a large proportion of informal economy workers lost their jobs and many other’s livelihoods are threatened. As a result, 1.6 billion in the informal sector – half the global workforce – are vulnerable to economic shocks and prone to plunge into extreme poverty in the next decade. Such an outcome is likely to be felt more strongly across developing nations in the next two years, causing global poverty to rise while disrupting the achievement of SDG 1 in reducing at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty.

The impacts of COVID-19 are not only limited to SDG 1 (No poverty) but also to SDG 2 (Zero hunger) by exacerbating distortions in world agricultural markets. In the meantime, it threatens agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers, especially in developing countries. A global study published by the Food and Agriculture Organization in partnership with Gallup World Poll showed that due to the impact of COVID-19 on the global food system, 2020 and 2021 will witness the highest levels of hunger in almost a decade. More importantly, the projections found that roughly 2.5 billion people—almost one-third of the world’s population—suffer some level of hunger. Consequently, due in part to resource scarcity they can't obtain enough food to satisfy their hunger. While 800,000 people are vulnerable to food insecurity, going entire days without eating at least once.

Perhaps the impact of COVD-19 is most felt on health care systems, posing a threat to implementing the SDG 3 (good health and well-being). For the first time in history, a health crisis has shut down the entire global economy, painfully demonstrating how inseparable healthcare and the economy have become. As COVID-19 rages across the world, the pandemic has exposed the inadequacy of public health systems worldwide, meanwhile, it has prompted an unprecedented strain on hospitals and healthcare workers. From a lack of medical supplies to issues in access among underserved populations, the COVID-19 crisis has become a burden to already stretched health systems, especially in developing countries. However, the main factor affecting their bottom line is the halt on elective procedures and surgeries to keep medical offices clear to reduce the risk of disease spread and prepare for COVID-19 patients.

Moreover, the pandemic remains a priority to many health systems in developing nations. They also have to cope with diseases such as malaria, HIV, and other communicable diseases. Consequently, the focus on COVID-19 has profoundly disrupted and altered the whole course of other disease prevention programs. The pandemic has put a spotlight on some of these problems and revealed holes in the healthcare delivery system that can have lasting effects on patients and workers alike. Beyond these impacts, COVID-19 has brought to public notice the urgency to address gaps in the many country’s public health infrastructures and prompted many inquiries on how to initiate change to deal with any future health crisis.

In addition to the aforementioned economic impacts of COVID-19 on SDG1, 2, and 3, the pandemic has also disrupted the fulfillment of SDG 4 (quality education) as many higher educational institutions shifted to online learning to finish the 2019-2020 academic year remotely. This has led to a reduction of teaching and administrative staff. Thus, these circumstances have impacted the quality of education and compelled many higher educational institutions to reduce staff and courses in order to adjust to the current situation which could continue for the next couple of years.

Opportunity for Change

The 2030 Agenda is ambitious but the million-dollar question now is whether the SDGs can be achievable by their target and if an economic recovery in the post-COVID-19 environment can effectively support a ‘leave no one behind’ aspiration? Given the recent record of weakened multilateralism, ending extreme poverty, combating climate change, and reducing inequality, and other goals have proved to be more than a challenge to overcome. Meanwhile, the rise of populism has compounded the sentiment of nationalism at the expense of multilateralism as one of the side-effects of the pandemic making an already-challenging path to SDG success even more difficult.

But there is ground for optimism because the quest for prosperity through development is much-needed in the post-COVID-19 world. If we don't make tough decisions today, the next generations are going to have to make far tougher decisions tomorrow. Hence, the world today needs more than ever to renew its collective commitment to the SDGs with a multilateral approach to addressing the most urgent development challenges. More importantly, relying on timely and disaggregated data that go hand-in-hand with a thorough assessment and comprehensive analysis of the economic and social repercussions of the pandemic will elevate countries' preparedness for the post-COVID-19 crisis.

Ultimately, given the underlying challenges of sustainable development, the global outlook looks bleak and the best-case scenario envisages a recovery exit from the pandemic in the first quarter of 2021 with a new vaccine coming in. However, a full economic recovery is going to take at least one to two years to reach pre-COVID-19 levels. Increasingly, the challenge, governments, and policymakers face today is not only the challenge of ending the pandemic but also recognizing that eradicating poverty and other matters in question must be carried out simultaneously with innovative actions that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and boost economic growth – all while tackling the pandemic to preserve the gains of the pre-COVID-19 period. The time is ripe for policy reform and policymakers have a great opportunity to align their policies around the SDGs. Let's hope that governments can rise to the challenge to tackle related problems that the pandemic has exacerbated. One thing is certain if we continue with business as usual, the depth of poverty will be greater and the SDG goals and targets will likely not be achieved in 2030.

Abdelillah Bendaoudi is a freelance writer based in Maryland with a particular focus on Sustainable Development. He is also a reporter and contributor at the Muslim Link Newspaper.